Reboot! What Is It Good For?
June 10th, 2013 by RanAbsolutely nothing like war? Let’s see. Man of Steel, a reboot of the Superman saga, is coming out this weekend, which is a good a reason as any to check the value of reboots. Those who oppose this new trend claim it stems from a lack of creativity, laziness and greed. Those who condone it say that sometimes movies become outdated, because of cultural and technical changes (special effect, CGI and such), and a reboot is a means of making the same story relevant to today’s viewers. This sounds like a noble endeavor in theory, but does it pass the reality test? For my research I have chosen 10 titles and their respective reboots and compared between them. I wanted to examine what has been changed (and why) in terms of mood or even plot, whether those reboots have something of value to add to the original or just intent on being a money milking machine. For the latter I take a look if they at the very least succeeded at making the money they so desperately need (to make other reboots, of course).
Here we go:
1. The first Batman Trilogy (1989, 1992, 1995) vs. the second Batman Trilogy (2005, 2008, 2012)
I know the first series had a fourth film, but because it sucked so badly I decided to leave it out. Thank you for your understanding.
What has Changed?
Everything really. The mood of the new trilogy is much bleaker, showing Batman as a very troubled superhero, who searches for his path in life. The old Batman does have his demons, but he seems a lot more together and less vulnerable. Plus, the new trilogy looks almost realistic, and very different from any other superhero film, while Tim Burton’s style is more campy than Christopher Nolan’s.
Box office comparison: $411,348,924, $266,822,354, $336,529,144 vs. $374,218,673, $1,004,558,444, $1,084,439,099
Verdict
There’s no question that the new Batman trilogy gave new life to this series. Both series are very different, which is very good, and both boast an excellent cast. While The Dark Knight is generally regarded as the best superhero movie of all time, I prefer the less ambitious Tim Burton films, but you could call it a tie.
2. Spider-Man (2002) vs. The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)
What has changed?
They added the word ‘Amazing’, but it just makes them look insecure. Andrew Garfield is more serious than Tobey Maguire as the arachnoid superhero. The new villain is a mad scientist (Rhys Ifans) instead of a mad businessman (Willem Dafoe), and while the original version put an emphasis on Peter Parker’s unfulfilled love with Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst), in the new version love does flourish with Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone).
Box office comparison: $821,708,551 worldwide for the original vs. $752,216,557 for the reboot.
Verdict
It’s hard to surpass the ‘original’ version, as it became kind of a modern classic, with memorable scenes that have been referenced a lot since. While the reboot is not bad, it doesn’t feel fresher than the original. Hence, I conclude that this reboot was a mere money milking machine, and unfortunately it succeeded at that.
3. Judge Dredd (1995) vs. Dredd (2012)
What has changed?
Sylvester Stallone became Karl Urban; 2D became 3D; the new version has a Neo Noir style and much more gore, with a dash of dark humor for good measure. For what it’s worth (and not a lot as you’ll see) critics liked the reboot a lot more than the original.
Box office comparison: A knockout for the critically bashed original - $113,493,481 vs. $35,626,525
Verdict
The gore and darkness of the reboot probably scared off viewers, which is a shame, because it’s much better than the original.
4. Star Trek (1966 – 1969) vs. Star Trek (2009)
What has changed?
While the original cult franchise had a very serious tone, J.J. Abrams’ reboot has a lot more humor, a faster pace and a definite Hollywood tone that did not exist in the series. Captain Kirk is more of a hotshot in the new version, but he’s also haunted by the past, and the death of his father, an element that does not exist in the series (as far as I know).
Box office comparison: N/A, but I don’t think you can rival the cult status, popularity and obsession that surrounds the series. the reboot made $385,680,446.
Verdict
Rebooting a franchise of this magnitude is very dangerous, but has a big upside. If the trekkies don’t like it you’re in big trouble, but if they do, the box office numbers can go where no film has gone before. All in all, it’s a great film, that can be enjoyed by old fans and new, with a strong story and great visuals.
5. Planet of the Apes (1968) vs. Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011)
What has changed?
Everything really. In the original film Charlton Heston lands in a distant planet ruled by apes only to discover that (spoiler…) it’s actually earth. The reboot of the franchise tells us the first phase of the story of how the apes came to rule our planet.
Box office comparison: $32,589,624 vs. $176,760,185 (domestic), but the original made five times more than its budget, compared to twice as much for the reboot.
Verdict
There’s definitely value in the reboot, which tells the story from the beginning, but I prefer the original’s surprising Twist.
6. Conan the Barbarian (1982) vs. Conan the Barbarian (2011)
What has changed?
Arnold Schwarzenegger was replaced by Jason Momoa. John Milius, the director of the original, decided to skimp on special effects and supernatural elements to make the film more realistic, while the reboot goes all-out on effects, sorcery and stuff like that.
Box office comparison: The original made $68,851,475 (or more than 100,000.000 according to some sources) while the reboot bombed with $48,795,021.
Verdict
The new version doesn’t come close. There’s a unique style to the original, which elevated it to cult status, while the reboot looks like any other big budget film.
7. Battlestar Galactica (1978) vs. Battlestar Galactica (2004)
What has changed?
There’s more emphasis on couple relations in the newer version and relations in general, which makes it more complex than the 70s series.
Success comparison: While the original series lasted only one season, the reboot had four, and became a cult series.
Verdict
This is easy, as the new show surpasses the old one in every parameter, with good special effects for a TV show, and a more complex storyline. Reboot wins!
8. The Hulk (2003) vs. The Incredible Hulk (2008)
What has changed?
Here they added the word ‘Incredible’… Guys, this insecurity thing is becoming worrisome. Ang Lee’s original was slower paced and heavier than its reboot, focusing more on what it means to be a hulk and on family relations, while Zack Penn’s version has a lighter touch and is more action oriented.
Box office comparison: $245,360,480 for the original, $263,427,551 for the reboot.
Verdict
I personally prefer the slower heavier Ang Lee version. Regardless, I think that the reboot was unnecessary, and we were better off with a sequel or something.
9. A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) vs. A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
What has changed?
Unfortunately nothing, except for the century.
Box office comparison: $25,504,513 domestic for the original (done on a minute $1.8 million budget) compared to $63,075,011 for the reboot (on a $35 million budget)
Verdict
If there’s a lesson to be learned from this exercise is: don’t touch cult films. Usually their remake feels older than the original. I’m sure the lesson is wasted, but I’m putting it out there.
10. Friday the 13th (1980) vs. Friday the 13th (2009)
What has changed?
One of the original Slasher films gets a reboot, and this time Jason is a bit more sympathetic than in the origin, depicting him as a down on your luck character. The girls are sexier and older than the teenagers in the original.
Box office comparison: $39,754,601 domestic for the original compared to $65,002,019 for the reboot.
Verdict
While it’s better than the Nightmare on Elm Street reboot, all signs point to the fact that this too was supposed to be a money milking machine, even if it had mediocre success at that. The original film has more freshness and still is scarier than the reboot.
My research conclusion: If you do a reboot, make sure it has something to contribute to its source material, and something original of its own offer up. Otherwise, it will probably bomb at the box office or suck in general. Thank you for your attention.
>> To comment on this blog post, or to share your own insight on entertainment, join us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/JinniDotCom
Technorati Tags: Reboot, Remake, Superman Returns, Man of Steel, The Hulk, The Incredible Hulk, Conan the Barbarian, Planet of the Apes, rise of the planet of the apes, Star Trek, Judge Dredd, Dredd, Spider-Man, The Amazing Spider-man, Batman, Batman Returns, Batman and Robin, Batman Begins, The Dark Knight, The Dark Knight Rises, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th, box-office, cult classic, Money, modern, classic, contemporary
Popularity: 1% [?]





































